SEAF
Experiences and Results in Africa and the Caribbean
SEAF interventions have been implemented
in seven countries, namely: Botswana,
Ghana, Jamaica, Mali, Namibia, Tanzania and Uganda. Each intervention
responded to specific needs of each participation stakeholder:
- Botswana
Management Support to the National Photovoltaic (PV) Programme
- Ghana
Integration of Solar PV Technology into Rural Electrification
- Jamaica
Supporting Energy Policy Making under Sustainable Development
- Mali
Revamping Jatropha-Oil Multifunctional Platforms
- Namibia
Implementation Guidelines for Off-grid Electrification Policies
- Tanzania
Biofuel as Alternative Resource for Women's Income
- Uganda
Facilitating Development of a Sustainable Biomass Energy Strategy
The selection of SEAF interventions
was driven by the following criteria:
- Synergistic effects
Since SEAF activities were aimed to be catalytic and supporting
planning or ongoing initiatives, priority was given to those
interventions that facilitate linkages and promote synergistic
effects.
- Enabling environment
Institutional capacity to support the intervention and to sustain
its effects over time as well as the effectiveness of interagency
co-ordination, institutional stability and human Resources.
- Thematic spread
In order to test the concept in different contexts, the SEAF
pilot phase has aimed at covering relatively large thematic
areas.
- Collaborative experience or contacts
with UNEP/UCC
To develop interventions rapidly, avoiding the need of establishing
new institutional links and procedures, ongoing interventions
have largely been identified by UNEP and UCC staff through personal
knowledge of opportunities, existing contacts with a number
of national institutions, and a modest outreach effort.
SEAF Interventions responded to specific needs:
- Uncovering technical, managerial and organisational barriers
that hinder the continuity of a programme (very low performance
of multifunctional platforms in Mali);
- Identification and analysis of unintended consequences and
negative effects of ongoing programmes (rural electrification
plans are eroding potential markets for solar PV in Ghana; off-grid
electrification policies are affected by rural electrification
plans in Namibia);
- Ensuring clarity and complementarity of sustainable development
objectives and national energy policy (sustainable development
goals are missing in energy policy formulation and decision-making
in Jamaica);
- Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of different institutions
and government agencies (lack of co-ordination between the Departments
of Forestry and Energy concerning fuel-wood policies in Uganda);
- Plugging unforeseen gaps unanticipated in a project formulation
(test sample and market study need to be expanded in the project
on Biofuel as Alternative Resource for Women's Income in Tanzania).
Key conclusions emerging from the
SEAF experience include the following:
Flexible and rapid assistance at the right time can yield widespread
benefits to further sustainable energy development;
A variety of technical, institutional and management -related
opportunities exist to move energy systems toward more sustainable
development paths. Tapping these opportunities in some case requires
small-scale and well targeted interventions;
Sustainable energy development is a broad concept that encompasses
multidimensional and close linked issues. Creating synergies among
different dimensions lead to more coordinated and harmonised strategies
to the implementation of project and policies.
Links with donnor supported activities have proven interesting
e.g., DANIDA in Ghana, GTZ in Uganda and Jamaica, and GEF in Tanzania,
but these opportunities can be better explored in a larger and
longer term activities.
|
Related Links
UNEP Risoe

Danida 
Related Documents
Project Brochure
(PDF - 96 KB)
|